• Publications
    • Books
    • Opinions
    • Analyses
    • Reports
  • Events
  • About
    • SETA DC
    • People
  • US-Türkiye Relations
  • Washington Gündemi
  • Contact
  • info@setadc.org
    202-223-9885
    1025 Connecticut Ave NW
    Suite 410
    Washington, DC 20036
  • Publications
    • Books
    • Opinions
    • Analyses
    • Reports
  • Events
  • About
    • SETA DC
    • People
  • US-Türkiye Relations
  • Washington Gündemi
  • Contact

Syrian Opposition and al-Rai

Kilic Bugra Kanat Posted On April 8, 2016
0


Yesterday it was reported that some opposition groups gained control of parts of the strategically important town of al-Rai from the DAESH. The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights reported that “the brigades of al-Motasim, al-Hamza, Sultan Murad, Suqour al-Jabal, 99, 55, Failaq al-Sham and other factions were able to take control of the town of al-Raii north of Aleppo after violent clashes against [DAESH.] The clashes continue west of the town amid explosions in the area [and there are] confirmed reports of losses in both parties.” The city was important to provide an important advantage for the opposition in northern Aleppo and to control important routes to the city.

The capture of the city by opposition forces demonstrates the potential of the opposition in the fight against DAESH. Since the emergence of DAESH, opposition forces have been waging two wars, with one against DAESH and one against the regime. Different opposition forces became the target of DAESH after the emergence of this terrorist organization. As DAESH gained more power and influence on the ground, opposition forces were squeezed between the regime’s airstrike and DAESH’s targeted assassinations, attacks and invasion of cities. Without much assistance from the international community the opposition forces lost a lot of ground to DAESH. Thus the opposition was never considered a viable option in the fight against DAESH or the regime. In an interview, U.S. President Barack Obama said: “Oftentimes, the challenge is if you have former farmers or teachers or pharmacists who now are taking up opposition against a battle-hardened regime, with support from external actors that have a lot at stake, how quickly can you get them trained; how effective are you able to mobilize them.”

One of the critical turning points was the DAESH attack on and siege of Kobani. Since then, the international coalition, and the U.S. in particular, preferred to focus on the People’s Protection Units (YPG) and concentrate its support with this organization. The military assistance helped greatly for the expansion of YPG’s zone of influence in northern Syria and serious violations of the human rights and crimes against humanity committed by this organization. In the meantime, when Ankara protested the U.S. arms assistance to the YPG, which Ankara considers a terrorist organization and an affiliate of the PKK, the U.S. administration insisted on an arbitrary and artificial distinction between PKK and YPG. According to the U.S. administration, the YPG is the only force on the ground that is capable of successfully fighting DAESH. This situation generated a serious problem for the fight against DAESH. On one hand, by supporting only the YPG and not other organizations, the U.S. left the opposition unprotected during the regime, Russia and DAESH’s attacks on the opposition. The train-and-equip program never fully materialized or operationalized to provide support for opposition groups. If the air cover and support and military assistance for the YPG were equally applied to some other opposition groups then the situation on the ground would be much different than it is today. There is a second risk during this period for the U.S. in its attempt to help YPG. On one hand, this situation puts the U.S. in a serious crisis with a critical ally, Turkey, in the fight against DAESH. Especially after the resuming of hostilities by the PKK, Ankara’s concerns of an uncontrollable and expanding YPG increased dramatically. On the other hand, by empowering a group like the YPG at this critical time, a post-war Syria was put at major risk.

This article was first published in the Daily Sabah on April 8, 2016. 




You may also like
The Challenge of the Syrian Opposition
February 5, 2016
  • Recent

    • Göçmenler Kongre Seçimlerinin Gündeminde
      October 23, 2026
    • Türkiye-U.S. Relations on the Eve of the Centennial...
      September 29, 2026
    • Abu Duhur attack: Israel's quest for regional supremacy
      August 25, 2026
    • Allies in Ankara: Beyond the Post-Cold War Order, Navigating...
      July 15, 2026
    • Allies in Ankara: Türkiye’s Security Vision and Role...
      July 15, 2026
    • Ankara Summit: Türkiye's strategic weight in NATO's...
      July 9, 2026
    • The Iran dilemma between war and diplomacy
      June 13, 2026
    • Trump, caught between hawks and pragmatism in Iran...
      May 29, 2026
    • Panel on Middle East Developments and the Future of Türkiye–Japan...
      April 21, 2026
    • “Strategic Implications of the Iran War” panel...
      March 30, 2026

  • Washington Gündemi

    • Kongre Seçimlerinde Son Düzlük
      October 30, 2026
    • Oylar Sayılmadan Davalar Açıldı
      October 30, 2026
    • Rusya ile Ukrayna Arasında Bölgesel Ateşkes
      October 30, 2026
    • İsrail Seçimlerinin Washington’a Yansımaları
      October 30, 2026
    • Senato Savaşında Üç Kritik Cephe
      October 23, 2026
    • İran Müzakerelerinde Seçim  Belirsizliği
      October 23, 2026
    • Rusya Yaptırımları Askıya Alındı
      October 23, 2026
    • Kongre Seçimlerinde Fon Savaşı
      October 16, 2026
    • Washington’ın Enflasyonla Mücadelesi
      October 16, 2026
    • Abluka İran Ekonomisini Zorluyor
      October 16, 2026



Stay Updated


© Copyright 2018-2022 SETA Foundation at Washington DC
Press enter/return to begin your search