• Publications
    • Books
    • Opinions
    • Analyses
    • Reports
  • Events
  • About
    • SETA DC
    • People
  • US-Türkiye Relations
  • Washington Gündemi
  • Contact
  • info@setadc.org
    202-223-9885
    1025 Connecticut Ave NW
    Suite 410
    Washington, DC 20036
  • Publications
    • Books
    • Opinions
    • Analyses
    • Reports
  • Events
  • About
    • SETA DC
    • People
  • US-Türkiye Relations
  • Washington Gündemi
  • Contact

What the Daesh Attack Means for Afghanistan’s future

SETA Foundation Burhanettin Duran Posted On August 30, 2021
0
356 Views


Daesh-Khorasan Province, or Daesh-K, carried out a bloody attack near Kabul Hamid Karzai International Airport in the Afghan capital as predicted by the intelligence community. That assessment was the reason evacuations had been surrounded by anxiety. That suicide bombing, which claimed the lives of American soldiers, members of the Taliban and civilians, suggests that the road ahead is full of challenges. It also goes to show that a minimum level of public safety, not to mention political stability, may be difficult to attain.

Of course, the current situation demonstrates the severity of the repercussions of United States President Joe Biden’s flawed withdrawal from Afghanistan. While the Republicans criticize Biden’s decisions, the White House concentrates on retaliation and remains committed to retreat. Biden is also ignoring the criticism from his country’s European allies, who are calling for responsible conduct. Indeed, he argues that the latest attack proved he was right to leave Afghanistan, and he has called for the completion of the evacuation without delay.

Let’s make one thing clear: The story of the U.S. involvement in Afghanistan is full of failures. The occupation itself was a mistake, the 20-year reconstruction effort was futile and Washington’s departure was plagued by problems.

Terror and evacuation

Daesh has already showcased its ability to spread terror in Afghanistan by attacking American soldiers during the evacuation. That attack was a message to the U.S. as well as the Taliban. Al-Qaida, which is not directly opposed to the Taliban, will probably operate more easily against the backdrop of Daesh terrorism. At this point, even the U.S. argument that American troops were in Afghanistan to combat terrorism, as opposed to nation-building, has been undermined.

Last week’s Daesh attack highlights the multitude of challenges that the Taliban face in Afghanistan. Forming a new government, which would include members of the old administration and local groups, may not be the hardest part after all. For the Taliban, the top priority seems to be stopping radical groups, which exploit their challenges in governing the country, from clustering around Daesh. If Daesh continues to carry out bloody attacks, the world’s attention may shift from the Taliban’s heavy-handed approach to public administration to Afghanistan’s terrorism problem. Alternatively, the Taliban may use Daesh as an excuse to adopt an exclusionist, harsh approach – which, obviously, would be a temporary solution.

Taliban’s fate

Sooner or later, the Taliban will have to engage in diplomacy with the great powers. The movement is also compelled to work with Pakistan and Qatar. Another point that the latest Daesh attack highlighted is that Afghanistan could suffer a great humanitarian tragedy in a situation where even the Taliban cannot seem to restore security and stability.

The attack on Kabul’s international airport showed the importance of the timing of the Turkish military’s evacuation. Although the Taliban asked Turkey for help running the airport, the terror threat makes the management of that facility highly risky. Indeed, President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan stressed that point at a press conference ahead of his flight to Bosnia-Herzegovina.

At this time, the Turkish government is still mulling over the Taliban’s request. It remains to be seen whether that group can provide an adequate level of security without help. What we witness today is a highly dynamic process. As such, it would not be surprising if the new Afghan government were to ask Turkey for assistance ensuring the airport’s safety.

Having evacuated its service people from Kabul, Ankara finds itself in a situation where it can make decisions in line with its own interests under the new circumstances. At the end of the day, Turkey will look for a safe way to assist the people of Afghanistan but fighting terrorism is not likely to be part of that mission.

This article was first published in Daily Sabah on August 30, 2021

Post Views: 356



  • Recent

    • 0x0b0ee5c3
      November 23, 2025
    • 0x81c366a9
      November 22, 2025
    • 0xd5d0bc9b
      November 21, 2025
    • 0x5e5e3596
      November 15, 2025
    • 0xee3f8311
      November 14, 2025
    • 0x44c85770
      November 14, 2025
    • 0xc0e3f4ad
      November 13, 2025
    • 0x18f13e22
      November 13, 2025
    • The End of the American Century? Interdependence, Soft...
      June 9, 2025
    • Trump-Netanyahu Relationship Takes a Turn for the Worse
      May 30, 2025

  • Washington Gündemi

    • Nvidia Büyümeye Devam Ediyor 
      November 21, 2025
    • Epstein Dosyası Kamuoyuna Açılıyor 
      November 21, 2025
    • Trump Yönetiminden Ukrayna İçin Yeni Barış Planı  
      November 21, 2025
    • Trump Muhammed bin Selman’ı Beyaz Saray’da Ağırladı
      November 21, 2025
    • Demokratlar Pes Etti: Federal Kapanma Sona Erdi
      November 14, 2025
    • Epstein Skandalı Trump’ın Peşini Bırakmıyor
      November 14, 2025
    • Beyaz Saray’ın Gazze Barış Planının Akıbeti...
      November 14, 2025
    • Trump Şara’yı Washington’da Ağırladı: Türkiye...
      November 14, 2025
    • Valilik Seçimleri Demokratları Umutlandırdı
      November 7, 2025
    • Mamdani New York’ta Tarih Yazdı
      November 7, 2025



Stay Updated


© Copyright 2018-2022 SETA Foundation at Washington DC
Press enter/return to begin your search